Amp vs Continue

Two Coding AI tools, side by side. Both are checked against their own published sites at time of listing. This comparison is editorially independent — neither tool has reviewed or endorsed this page. Here is what each does well and who it is for, so you can choose what fits.

Amp

ampcode.com

An agentic coding tool built by Sourcegraph

Best forIndividual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models

What it doesAmp is a coding agent that runs in the terminal and can be controlled from web, mobile, or command line. It offers multiple operating modes, a Diffs feature for reviewing and staging changes, and plugin extensibility for custom workflows.

Capabilities

• Agent execution in the terminal with remote control
• Diffs for code review and change staging
• Multiple modes including smart, Deep and Rush
• Plugin extensibility for custom agents
• Team collaboration with authenticated sessions

Visit Amp →

Continue

www.continue.dev

Open-source AI coding agent

Best forDevelopers wanting an open-source AI coding assistant they can extend

What it doesContinue is an open-source AI coding agent built to assist developers within their workflows, with the stated mission of amplifying rather than automating developers. Its open-source codebase remains available as a foundation for community development.

Capabilities

• Open-source AI coding agent
• IDE-integrated assistance
• Developer workflow support
• Community-extensible codebase

Visit Continue →