Amp vs Cursor
Two Coding AI tools, side by side. Both are verified against their own live sites. Here is what each does well and who it is for, so you can choose what fits.
Amp
ampcode.com
An agentic coding tool built by Sourcegraph
Best forIndividual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models
What it doesAmp is a coding agent that runs in the terminal and can be controlled from web, mobile, or command line. It offers multiple operating modes, a Diffs feature for reviewing and staging changes, and plugin extensibility for custom workflows.
Capabilities
Visit Amp →- Agent execution in the terminal with remote control
- Diffs for code review and change staging
- Multiple modes including smart, Deep and Rush
- Plugin extensibility for custom agents
- Team collaboration with authenticated sessions
Cursor
www.cursor.com
AI code editor with agentic development and codebase context
Best forProfessional developers and teams who want an agentic editor with deep codebase understanding.
What it doesCursor is an AI-powered code editor and agent that can build, test, and demo features end to end. It offers accurate tab autocomplete, full codebase understanding through semantic search and indexing, and integrations with the terminal, Slack, and GitHub pull requests, with a choice of leading models.
Capabilities
Visit Cursor →- Agentic development that builds, tests, and demos features
- Accurate tab autocomplete
- Full codebase understanding via semantic search
- Works in the terminal, Slack, and GitHub PRs
How to choose
Choose Amp if you are individual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models. Choose Cursor if you are professional developers and teams who want an agentic editor with deep codebase understanding. Both sit in Coding; the right pick depends on your exact workflow and budget.
Not sure which to pick?
Get our short, vendor-neutral AI briefing and we will help you choose well.
Double opt-in · unsubscribe any time