Amp vs Magic
Two Coding AI tools, side by side. Both are verified against their own live sites. Here is what each does well and who it is for, so you can choose what fits.
Amp
ampcode.com
An agentic coding tool built by Sourcegraph
Best forIndividual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models
What it doesAmp is a coding agent that runs in the terminal and can be controlled from web, mobile, or command line. It offers multiple operating modes, a Diffs feature for reviewing and staging changes, and plugin extensibility for custom workflows.
Capabilities
Visit Amp →- Agent execution in the terminal with remote control
- Diffs for code review and change staging
- Multiple modes including smart, Deep and Rush
- Plugin extensibility for custom agents
- Team collaboration with authenticated sessions
Magic
www.magic.dev
Frontier code models to automate software engineering
Best forOrganizations exploring frontier models for large-context code automation
What it doesMagic builds frontier code models aimed at automating software engineering and research. Its approach combines frontier-scale pre-training, domain-specific reinforcement learning for code, and ultra-long context windows for handling large codebases and complex problems.
Capabilities
Visit Magic →- Frontier code models
- Domain-specific reinforcement learning
- Ultra-long context windows
- Inference-time compute optimization
How to choose
Choose Amp if you are individual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models. Choose Magic if you are organizations exploring frontier models for large-context code automation. Both sit in Coding; the right pick depends on your exact workflow and budget.
Not sure which to pick?
Get our short, vendor-neutral AI briefing and we will help you choose well.
Double opt-in · unsubscribe any time