Amp vs Cody
Two Coding AI tools, side by side. Both are verified against their own live sites. Here is what each does well and who it is for, so you can choose what fits.
Amp
ampcode.com
An agentic coding tool built by Sourcegraph
Best forIndividual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models
What it doesAmp is a coding agent that runs in the terminal and can be controlled from web, mobile, or command line. It offers multiple operating modes, a Diffs feature for reviewing and staging changes, and plugin extensibility for custom workflows.
Capabilities
Visit Amp →- Agent execution in the terminal with remote control
- Diffs for code review and change staging
- Multiple modes including smart, Deep and Rush
- Plugin extensibility for custom agents
- Team collaboration with authenticated sessions
Cody
sourcegraph.com
AI coding assistant that uses development context to write and fix code
Best forDevelopers and teams who want code assistance grounded in their full codebase context.
What it doesCody is an AI coding assistant from Sourcegraph that uses current models together with codebase context to help developers understand, write, and fix code. It pulls context through Sourcegraph's search to surface APIs, symbols, and usage patterns across a codebase. It works in VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, and a web app.
Capabilities
Visit Cody →- Chat with repository context
- Auto-edit contextual code changes
- Customizable and premade prompts
- Context filters for repositories
How to choose
Choose Amp if you are individual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models. Choose Cody if you are developers and teams who want code assistance grounded in their full codebase context. Both sit in Coding; the right pick depends on your exact workflow and budget.
Not sure which to pick?
Get our short, vendor-neutral AI briefing and we will help you choose well.
Double opt-in · unsubscribe any time