Amp vs Windsurf Editor
Two Coding AI tools, side by side. Both are verified against their own live sites. Here is what each does well and who it is for, so you can choose what fits.
Amp
ampcode.com
An agentic coding tool built by Sourcegraph
Best forIndividual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models
What it doesAmp is a coding agent that runs in the terminal and can be controlled from web, mobile, or command line. It offers multiple operating modes, a Diffs feature for reviewing and staging changes, and plugin extensibility for custom workflows.
Capabilities
Visit Amp →- Agent execution in the terminal with remote control
- Diffs for code review and change staging
- Multiple modes including smart, Deep and Rush
- Plugin extensibility for custom agents
- Team collaboration with authenticated sessions
Windsurf Editor
windsurf.com
Agentic IDE that builds AI into the development environment
Best forIndividual engineers and enterprise teams who want an agentic coding experience inside a dedicated editor.
What it doesWindsurf is an AI-powered IDE that integrates code generation and autonomous task delegation directly into the editor. Its Cascade feature combines codebase understanding with real-time awareness of developer actions, and Tab provides generative autocomplete. It supports the Model Context Protocol and in-IDE website previews.
Capabilities
Visit Windsurf Editor →- Cascade agentic coding assistant
- Tab generative autocomplete
- Windsurf Previews for live site editing
- Model Context Protocol support
How to choose
Choose Amp if you are individual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models. Choose Windsurf Editor if you are individual engineers and enterprise teams who want an agentic coding experience inside a dedicated editor. Both sit in Coding; the right pick depends on your exact workflow and budget.
Not sure which to pick?
Get our short, vendor-neutral AI briefing and we will help you choose well.
Double opt-in · unsubscribe any time