Amp vs Zed
Two Coding AI tools, side by side. Both are verified against their own live sites. Here is what each does well and who it is for, so you can choose what fits.
Amp
ampcode.com
An agentic coding tool built by Sourcegraph
Best forIndividual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models
What it doesAmp is a coding agent that runs in the terminal and can be controlled from web, mobile, or command line. It offers multiple operating modes, a Diffs feature for reviewing and staging changes, and plugin extensibility for custom workflows.
Capabilities
Visit Amp →- Agent execution in the terminal with remote control
- Diffs for code review and change staging
- Multiple modes including smart, Deep and Rush
- Plugin extensibility for custom agents
- Team collaboration with authenticated sessions
Zed
zed.dev
A fast, multiplayer code editor with native AI agents
Best forDevelopers who want a fast modern editor with agentic editing and real-time collaboration built in
What it doesZed is a code editor written in Rust that pairs high performance with native AI integration. Developers can delegate work to an agent, follow its progress live, and review changes inline alongside built-in Git and multi-language debugging.
Capabilities
Visit Zed →- Agentic editing with live progress and review
- Edit prediction via an open model
- Native Git integration
- Multi-language debugging (Debug Adapter Protocol)
- Real-time collaboration and screen sharing
How to choose
Choose Amp if you are individual developers and teams who want an agentic workflow paired with frontier models. Choose Zed if you are developers who want a fast modern editor with agentic editing and real-time collaboration built in. Both sit in Coding; the right pick depends on your exact workflow and budget.
Not sure which to pick?
Get our short, vendor-neutral AI briefing and we will help you choose well.
Double opt-in · unsubscribe any time