Maket vs TestFit
Two Architecture AI tools, side by side. Both are verified against their own live sites. Here is what each does well and who it is for, so you can choose what fits.
Maket
www.maket.ai
Generate floor plans and visualise homes with AI
Best forHomeowners, builders and architects generating and visualising residential floor plans
PricingFreemium, from $20/month · current pricing
What it doesMaket is purpose-built for architecture, generating editable, dimensionally accurate residential floor plans from natural language descriptions of rooms, shape and square footage. Users iterate on styles, layouts and finishes and visualise designs using a built-in style library or custom reference images.
Capabilities
Visit Maket →- Natural-language floor plan generation
- Editable, dimensioned layouts
- Style-based visualisation
- Design iteration
- Floor plan upload
TestFit
www.testfit.io
AI-powered real estate feasibility and site planning
Best forArchitects and developers running site feasibility and parking studies
PricingPaid, from $2,100/year · current pricing
What it doesTestFit automates early-stage site planning and feasibility analysis using generative AI. It creates optimised building layouts, parking configurations and 3D massing based on parameters such as zoning, density and floor area ratios, alongside financial projections, helping architects and developers evaluate deals quickly.
Capabilities
Visit TestFit →- Generative site and building layouts
- Parking optimisation
- Feasibility and deal evaluation
- Real-time 3D massing
- Financial pro forma
How to choose
Choose Maket if you are homeowners, builders and architects generating and visualising residential floor plans. Choose TestFit if you are architects and developers running site feasibility and parking studies. Both sit in Architecture; the right pick depends on your exact workflow and budget.
Not sure which to pick?
Get our short, vendor-neutral AI briefing and we will help you choose well.
Double opt-in · unsubscribe any time